Home | Philosophy | Fundamentals | Levels | Consumer Articles  

Choice of Prosthetic Components
Many young traumatic amputees are adamant about obtaining the highest tech prosthetic components for their prosthesis. The prosthesis becomes a part of their body and their desire for the finest is understandable. However, many of the high tech components are not optimal for the first year of amputee care. Some of the highest-end foot and ankle components are actually too stiff for the first 6 to 12 months of ambulating. Other less technologically deluxe components actually make adapting to the prosthetic device easier. A new prosthetic prescription should only be generated after the amputee has established a steady symmetric gait, can engage in impact activities and is ready to advance to a higher level of activity. He should be able to maneuver barriers, manage stairs and negotiate inclines and ramps. This typically does not happen until between months 9 and 18. Only at this point is a new, higher-tech prosthesis useful. The old prosthesis can be refurbished to become a spare limb or a water limb.

Conclusion
It is essential that the thoughtful amputation surgeon understand the entire course of the amputation process, from the initial emergency room visit to the final selection of the perfect prosthesis. As devastating as it is for the patient, amputation will always be a difficult and a complex process for the surgeon as well. It asks the surgeon to successfully balance exacting surgical technique and knowledge, his intimate familiarity with the entire course of amputee care and his human understanding of each of his unique patients. Remembering the young woman’s vision at the start of this chapter, we think not of artificial limbs, but instead of replacement limbs. The surgeon capable of making an amputation successful, can indeed help make the patient whole.

Acknowledgement:
Much of this material was updated from Ernest M. Burgess (deceased September 2000), Atlas of Limb Prosthetics - Surgical and Prosthetic Principles, Edition 1, 1981.

References:

  • Berlemont M, et al: Ten Years of Experience with Immediate Application of Prosthetic Devices to Amputations of the Lower Extremity on the Operating Table. Prosth. Orthot. Int., Vol 3, No. 8, 1969.
  • Burgess EM: (1 st edition of the Atlas, 1981, Mosby)
  • Burgess EM, Romano RL, Zettl JH: The Management of Lower-Extremity Amputations. TR 10-6, US Government Printing Office, 1969.
  • Burgess EM, Romano RL, Zettl JH, Schrock RD: Amputations of the Leg for Peripheral Vascular Insufficiency. J Bone and Joint Surgery. 53-A, 874-90, 1971.
  • Coleman K, Boone D, Smith DG, Laing L, Mathews D, Czerneicki J: Cross-Over Trial Comparing Alpha Liner with Pelite Liner for Trans-Tibial Prostheses Using Ambulatory Activity and Questionnaire Responses. Transactions of the Tenth World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics. July 4, 2001, Glasgow, Scotland.
  • Fergason JR, Smith DG: Socket Considerations for the Transtibial Amputee. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Number 361, pg. 76-84, April 1999.
  • Harris WR, Silverstein EA: Partial Amputations Of The Foot: A Follow-Up Study. Can. J Surgery. 7:6, 1964
  • Humzah MD, Gilbert PM: Fasciocutaneous Blood Supply in Below-Knee Amputations. J Bone and Joint Surgery. 79-B, 441-443, 1997.
  • Legro MW, Reiber GE, del Aguila M, Alax MJ, Boone DA, Larsen JA, Smith DG, and Sangeorzan BJ: Issues of Importance Reported by Persons with Lower Extremity Amputations and Prostheses. J of Rehabilitation, Research and Development, 36(3):155-63, July 1999.
  • Melzack R: Phantom Limbs. Scientific American, p. 120-126, April 1992.
  • Millstein SG, Mccowan SA, and Hunter GA: Traumatic Partial Foot Amputations in Adults - A Long Term Review. J of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol. 70-B, P 251-254, 1988.
  • Mooney V, Harvey JP, McBride E, Snelson, R: Comparison of Postoperative Stump Management: Plaster vs. Soft Dressings. J Bone and Joint Surgery Vol. 53-A, 241-249, March 1971.
  • Pedersen HE: Treatment of Ischemic Gangrene and Infection in the Foot. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Number 16: 199-202, 1960.
  • Pedersen HE: The Problem of the Geriatric Amputee. Artificial. Limbs, Vol. 12(Suppl 2): i-iii, Autumn, 1968.
  • Smith DG: Amputations, in Current Diagnosis and Treatment in Orthopaedics, editor - Harry Skinner, edition 2, pg. 577-601, Lange Publishing, 1999.
  • Smith DG, Ehde DM, Legro MW, Reiber GE, del Aguila M, Boone DA: Pain and Sensations in the Phantom Limb, the Residual Limb, and the Back Reported by Persons with Lower Extremity Amputations. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Number 361, pg. 29-38, April 1999.
  • Smith DG, Fergason JR: Transtibial Amputations. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Number 361, pg. 108-115, April 1999.
  • Waters RL, Perry J, Antonelli D, et al: The Energy Cost of Walking of Amputees - Influence of Level of Amputation. J Bone and Joint Surgery. 58A, 42-46, 1976.
  • Willingham L: A New Vision for Limb Loss. Prosthetics Research Study. Seattle, WA

10/10

                                                                  Menu